On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:45 PM Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 16/04/17 09:03 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: > >FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another > reason: it has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense at > all of consistency / interoperability between the different things that you > can construct with it. Whereas for OpenStack I believe you are also aiming > for some forms of consistency and interoperability. > > Could you expand on why you think the lego analogy does not cover > consistency > and interoperability? > Well, for example, because you can build either a house or a jellyfish out of Lego, and I don't think there's anything about the relationship between those two things that evokes the consistency that some folks are talking about / looking for between OpenStack components. Neil
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev