Please refrain from keeping your mouth shut.


It is a good topic to bring back to life, we have discussed the lifecycle 
process on TSC calls over the last weeks (when not addressing Colorado) and 
have an intention to look further into improvements and development during the 
Danube release.  Now is the right time to raise topics and it may even be worth 
spinning out an action point or two to find focus areas and activities to work 
on.  (Let’s see if we have time on Tuesday to add it to the agenda)


Two top of mind topics in this area:

·         We have an open item to discuss branching and developer support on 
the tech discuss calls.

·         We have an activity to provide useful project metrics for the 
community from our dashboards.

·         An ongoing thread and committed activities to help track upstream, 


/ Chris


From: <> on behalf of Ash 
Date: Thursday 22 September 2016 at 22:19
To: Daniel Smith <>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on Upstreaming Questions


Once upon a time, we had a process Lifecycle process for taking care of this, 
but ya'll TSC folks vetoed me. And instead, we put something in place that 
proved to be simpler, but not as useful as we had apparently hoped. 


I could always dust off that prior work, if there's any interest. We had 
collaborative input on it. 


Sorry for jumping in on your TSC thread. I'll go back to keeping my mouth shut. 


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Daniel Smith <> wrote:

Hello TSC Membrs

Several weeks ago as part of the inclusion of Requirements Projects,  I asked 
how we know that people are looking at what we are producing in Requirements 
projects and how we (OPNFV) ensure that deliverables from Requirements projects 
are being reviewed and taken into account upstream (from an OPNFV overall 


Would any of you be able to shed some light on this?  The current impression 
that I have is we have the docs that sit in a repo and that’s it.


Thank you





Daniel Smith

Sr. System Designer

Ericsson Inc.  

8400 Decarie Blvd.  Montreal, PQ




Legal entity: Ericsson AB, registered office in Stockholm. This Communication 
is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set 
out at 


opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list


_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 

opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to