On 6/10/18 04:43, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote: > Dear Opsawg, > > A status update on informational T+ Draft: > > 1) Current discussion between Andrej and (mainly) Joe Clarke on some section > 9 (Security), ongoing, Andrej/Authors will respond to Joe’s latest comments > shortly. > 2) Diffs between Version 6 and Version 10 with brief annotations of each diff > sent to Newsgroup > 3) Authors Recently reviewed section 9 (Security), and reflect that it > includes some redundant and overlapping content in the sections: > “9.5. TACACS+ Client Implementation Recommendations . . . . . . 39 > 9.6. TACACS+ Server Implementation Recommendations . . . . . . 39 > 9.7. TACACS+ Deployment Best Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . 40” > …consequently, we are planning to propose rationalised single section to > cover Best Practices. We will present a proposal this week for initiating > discussion, the result of which we will look to include in next version.
Hello, T+ authors. What is the status of this work? It's now been two weeks since you sent this (and a month between this and the previous email). For this work to progress, we need much more frequent engagement. To that end, can one of you present the status of the work and your plan to move towards ratification in Montreal? Thanks. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
