> On Jun 28, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Joe Clarke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I would ask that people like Alan (that have been very vocal) make sure > that any points have been addressed and if specific changes require more > thorough explanation.
I would prefer that the document approach publication quality before doing significantly more work. Despite many, many, reviews and both editorial and technical feedback, the new text in the document isn't much better than text from 3 years ago. It's still vague, not prescriptive, doesn't use normative text, etc. I've done do a quick check recently, and there are still major issues with the document. So there isn't much point in doing more detailed reviews. Having done that lots, I'm disinclined to do it again. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
