> On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:12 PM, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Andrej Ota <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think that forbidding some parts with MUST would go against the original >> mandate for this draft which I understood to be documenting what's used and >> specifically not working to do a revision of protocol (which I would love to >> hide behind TLS). > > The IETF is not about rubber-stamping existing implementations or practices. >
imo - documenting existing practice is not the same thing as “rubber stamping” Scott _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
