I have browsed the contents of the "shop" and I find that really interesting.
The only part that I found missing, and that's strange after all the discussions about diagram use and copyright infringement that we've been having here, is an attempt at standardizing a set of licenses that the designer could (should) choose from before putting a diagram online. I write "should" because for example, there is no indication about what Yash Mittal wants us to be able to do with his work, and _that_ should be compulsory, *because* we don't want copyright infringement to happen. Also, there are plenty of diagrams around that are free. I think authors should propose them to the shop and select the license they want. With that in mind, if we could try to define what would be potential limit options to what the user does with the diagram we'd have a good framework to create standard licenses that pertain to origami and its specificities and we'd be in a better position to reshape the debate on origami works use. If that's been already done somewhere, I'd like pointers too. Jean-Christophe Helary ---------------------------------------- fun: http://mac4translators.blogspot.com work: http://www.doublet.jp (ja/en > fr) tweets: http://twitter.com/brandelune
