On Oct 9, 2012, at 12:32 AM, Gareth Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> As far as the licenses go, it seems like there are just a handful of things > out would have to cover. The creative commons license operates under a neat > structure, where there are a few different parameters (commercial use, > share-alike, attribution) that can be set independently to fit the > creator's wishes. And any of them can be waived by the rights holder on a > case-by-case basis. It seems like a similar kind of license would cover > basically all the different cases, while not being overly complicated. > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ I thought about the creative commons but I don't think they are sufficient to cover all the aspects of origami. Jean-Christophe Helary ---------------------------------------- fun: http://mac4translators.blogspot.com work: http://www.doublet.jp (ja/en > fr) tweets: http://twitter.com/brandelune
