Hi Shayne, 2009/3/25 Tueller, Shayne R Civ USAF AFMC 519 SMXS/MXDEC < [email protected]>
> Are you implying that the current D3D is not backwards compatible with > previous versions? I believe that a current D3D application can query > earlier versions of the D3D interface through COM. A D3D 3.0 application > can > still run under D3D 10.0 as I understand it... > The problem is not the the old D3D versions API aren't available, but the fact that the jump between versions is discrete. If you want D3D 10.0 functionality you have to use D3D 10, you can't just use one part of D3D 10 and keep the rest of your app building against D3D 9. You can't get access to D3D features unless you are on Vista. This a very different situation to that of OpenGL based apps that like the OSG have been able to evolve bit by bit as few hardware + API features were exposed in OpenGL. If you are trying to maintain an application for a long period then handling widely different hardware and OS combinations is key. The D3D model really doesn't help you at all. The D3D model only suits making an app for specific era, once that era is gone the app just stays in that era unless you retool in a significant way. For a game that is developed and sells for a couple of years it might be able to come and go in just one era, but for most applications this isn't the case. Interestingly for open source games that take many years to write and evolve over time their lifetime is potentially far longer than commericial games, so open source games have more similar needs to API evolution and portability that conventional long lived graphis applications have. Robert.
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
