An alternative form of attribution are links to the services and
software we use. These are I think always appreciated. Links would be
informative for users and would show what we use, rather than just
saying it. I would rather have attribution with links to my projects
than statements of thanks, however sincere. Attributions are statements
of facts and do not imply endorsement.
On 03/08/18 12:21, Cameron Shorter wrote:
-0 for "Thanks" for this release from me because I don't think we have
time to define our guidelines for what should be included, and I
wouldn't want to add thanks for a project and then take it away.
On 1/08/2018 10:51 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
+0 for a "Thanks" section. I have no objection, but do we need to
thank Ubuntu? Debian? The Linux and Apache Foundations? Their
contributors? Do we have a rule of thumb for who we thank?
Kind regards,
Ben.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand
_______________________________________________
osgeolive mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeolive
