Hello All,

I think is is essential to acknowledge the source and the content of the 3 'phases' of OAA.

It's the OSLIST community.

When orgs start with this "process-change" stuff, they are getting some "training-wheels"..... with the 100 days bracketed (some may say: /contained/) by a "begin/end boundary" .....defined by time....100 days. It's not just a time-based container though....it's' more like a field with some weird attraction and repulsion properties.

The various people in the situation do shift...many 'resisters' become 'tolerators' of new ideas. And some 'tolerators' become 'supporters' of new ideas. And truth be told, some just never, ever change their minds. Which is OK. Part of the process. So there is this containment aspect, and this attract/repulse "field" aspect I haven't quite figured out yet...

...At "OST-2", that ending OST meeting, the meeting is as actually more of a PROSPECTIVE than a 'retrospective', although there is (for sure) a retrospective aspect to that meeting.

However what experience has taught is the following:

1. That OST2 has people VERY passionate and ready to work. They know
   the OST game now, and those not passionate on the theme do avoid it...
2. Attendance overall is lower...
3. As a consequence, the OST-2 Closing Circle is smaller, however....
4. Those people in that OST-2 Closing Circle are fully
   /energized/....and the new /champions/....the "passionates" that
   literally REPLACE THE COACH and help shift the whole darned thing.


....so that 2nd meeting is a VERY BIG DEAL. These "passionates" know EXACTLY what they want to see happen after that meeting, and they are not shy about saying it. The topics tend to be WAY more clustered around 1 or 2 big ideas, usually 1 big "here and now we need to do THIS" kind of a theme.



So they go DO that. It's not like I need to do anything. I just watch-- pretty much teh last thing I do there before I vacate.

Now after that, they may schedule a OST-3....that is their call. Often they do immediately go and do that, but I have absolutely nothing to do with it.

I (in Agile-coach role) actually vacate after OST-2. And they just "take off" to the next level. They may or may not do OST-3. They usually do. At one place I helped identify a OST facilitator....my guidance being, "get one from outside your org if you want to do a 3rd OST." That said they do whatever they like....

Summarizing:

 * OST-1 to OST-2: Phase 1 OAA
 * OST-2 to OST-3: Phase 2 OAA
 * After that: no "scheduled" OST events any more. Phase 3 OAA


....this idea comes from advice given here by Anne Stadler and others, from the the harvested learnings from Spirited Work.

Scheduling the OST beyond OST-3 might be kind of dead and liveless right?

Where is the BURNING ISSUE?!? Can such an issue be scheduled? Planned? Managed?

Doing so would be kind of weird right? Where's the passion? There has to BE SOME.



So: everything has a beginning, middle and end. And for sure the OAA passage-rite is designed to be EXACTLY like that. It starts: OST-1. There is a messy middle: the 100 days. And there is an end: OST-2. That end is punctuated by THE COACH VACATING. At the last place I did this, I told them I was not available by email or phone or text for 30 days.

That worked really amazing actually. Better than I had hoped. They really got busy doing stuff and when I came back to observe, it was really cool. They had taken things into their own hands, it was crazy-good. And they did do another Open Space (OST-3) and someone from here on OSLIST ("the unnamed woman of mystery") did facilitate that.

And I have no idea what that org might actually do next. I suspect it will be very interesting however.....

Daniel







On 3/24/15 1:22 PM, Martin Grimshaw via OSList wrote:
Hi folks

Just wanted to say I enjoyed this exchange. As a collaborator of Francois Knuchel working with Daniel Mezick in developing Open Agile Adoption and Prime/OS into our adaption, Open Smart Transformation (provided by Caterfly) to take Daniel's ideas and model way beyond Agile to support shifts to Smarter Working or solving problems together using Open Space, I have to say I heartily agree with what has already been said on this thread. But it is not because my business benefits from saying that; rather, it is because of the power of Daniel's innovation in using OS in bringing self-led collaborative change that Francois and I have launched a business service based upon it.

Jan: I love the language you used, using 'Open Spaces as a 'heart beat' in organizations'. I'll certainly use that metaphor in the future :)

Warm wishes

Martin Grimshaw

There's Better Ways Of Working <http://2bwow.org.uk>
Twitter @ThrivingPlanet <http://twitter.com/ThrivingPlanet>
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/martingrimshawbrighton>

Caterfly <http://caterfly.co.uk>
Twitter @CaterflyOST <http://twitter.com/CaterflyOST>
<http://twitter.com/ThrivingPlanet>
Follow our Smarter Working <http://caterfly.co.uk/the-buzz/> blog

/Smarter. Sharper. Together. Helping you achieve a smarter workplace/

On 23/03/15 17:58, Suzanne Daigle via OSList wrote:
Daniel,

*Thank You* for this and all that preceded it. I've been going through my own angst on the same questions that you've just posed.

Plus something that Harrison said earlier:

    The “*cure*” would then be to stop the wounding, at least until
    we could see how things might go. Of course, if the situation
    really is *terminal*, then by all means, Bring it on! That could
    be SCRUM, Facilitation, Last Rites, whatever...


Stop the wounding, see how things might go.... less is more and letting go is a *very tall order*!

I know that from what I personally struggled with _after_ my first experiences in Open Space. As a manager, a leader, a mom, a friend, I got a sense of where I had been controlling too much and doing too much under the auspices of coordinating, helping, and yes, even leading. For a period of time, I even questioned what my whole life had been -- these were not easy questions. Others I know will suffer the same insights (grief indeed!). What's worse is that our top down hierarchy organizational models have rewarded us for this calling it good leadership. Control is embedded everywhere...insidious almost.

As a facilitator, I saw the emergent bliss of others experiencing Open Space. I witnessed the great good that came of it with some degree of "sticking" power. But I could not deny that people were going back to stuck systems and practices in their ways of working with many remaining questions buried inside them. The opportunity of "seeing of how things go"...with the opportunity to reinvent the work of the business while also running the business itself seemed a mammoth task! I felt there was more for me to do, not singlehandedly or in an enabling way but in a roll up our sleeves, let's figure this out together. It's why I was so drawn to Agile...because I felt it supported the journey towards self-organizing, a journey with collaborative practices that had application beyond software.

Is it considered "terminal" if we help either with Scrum or other distributed leadership processes/practices that self-management companies are utilizing now (like Morning Star, W.L. Gore) to break the cycle of control and predictability embedded in our command/control structures? Would that be organizing the self-organizing?

What you described Daniel...as raw as it is (body bags is not an exaggeration!) does strike a deep chord. Thank you for articulating it so well.

I am heartened by your words as I hope for the same.

    Is Open Space JUST for orgs that are in /total crisis/....those
    that are /completely freaked out/....and completely out of aces
    and perceived options?

    Because, I suspect OST is a lot more robust than that. .. A lot
    more versatile than that.


I also connected with what Francois so eloquently and passionately described.


OK, so what? So what, you may say, if you’re not into agile. Well what Daniel has introduced *goes way beyond agile*. The
    framework Daniel has put together, surely, is relevant to any
    adoption (implementation of a new system or working practice),
    not just agile.  It relevant to lean adoption, responsive
    adoption, environmental management adoption – indeed it is
    *relevant to any change or transformation process*.  So guys,
    forget the agile bit, what Daniel is introducing is a way of
    introducing fundamental transformation into any organisation and
    *making it stick*.


In the pursuit towards self-organization (self-management), between less is more and letting go, I believe there is important work to be done in the way of "opening space and holding space" with the same intentionality as is there when we facilitate. I do not want to be in the sidelines of this work. Nor do I want to control it.

Options, stepping stones, make some stew together, etc. Rolling up our sleeves to do the work that needs doing and figuring out how the evolution from "here" to "there" might go, helping each other however those roles play out, it seems to me that that is what life and the real work of life is all about.

Having said all this, there is a part of me that still wonders... if "doing nothing is not the doing of everything" though I have yet to conceive what "doing nothing that is everything" really is.

For now I won't overthink it cause I fear I'll be missing out on the best of life if I live in my head too much on these questions. Best to experience as it unfolds.

Suzanne...trekking on!






Suzanne Daigle
Open Space Facilitator
NuFocus Strategic Group

FL 941-359-8877
Cell: 203-722-2009
www.nufocusgroup.com <http://www.nufocusgroup.com>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Twitter @Daiglesuz


On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Daniel Mezick via OSList <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Friends and Citizens of OSLIST:

    Greetings.

    As I continue to think, and get experience and learn, I realize
    that what I often "see and hope for an org" and "what is possible
    right here right now" .....those 2 items have a big, huge gap.
    Certainly a lot of the gap can be closed in one step....but THE
    WHOLE THING?

    So for example: yes, it is a great aspirational goal to
    "eliminate all meetings", and even have Open Space as a passing
    aha (...we graduated! We no longer need OST!!) and so on.

    Question: How do you get there... without various people going
    out in body bags from stress? From freaking out? from culture shock?

    Eliminating any and all forms of meeting AND getting rid of any
    formal facilitation are all great goals....to bring the org to
    such a state of advancement that, well, you know, they are just
    AMAZING....all open space all the time....

    Now: is speeding that up beyond what people can handle actually a
    good idea?

    Wondering....

    So for example getting rid of all meetings might go like this:

    1. Facilitate all meetings or awhile
    2. Make all meeting optional, too
    3. Eventually, just GET RID OF all meetings.

    This progression (through time) makes sense to me.

    Because, to tell you the truth, "step 1" ain't as easy as it
    looks....

    ...now, can we just SHOCK an org into evolving?

    Does the real world really work that way?

    Consider the guidance for the Open Space invitation: "4 to 6
    weeks in advance." Yes we can do 2 weeks or 2 days, that said....
    the standard guidance is to give them many weeks.... to "figure
    out what the invitation MEANS...." ... to "integrate the invite",
    etc.

    Orgs seem to have "currently-available range of options"
    (destinations) for evolving. A range or collection of
    /destinations/ they can go to.... from here. Kind of like
    stepping stones. Kind of like this:

    1. Identify what set of stepping-stone destinations ("leaps") are
    immediately possible, and
    2. Invite them to pick one, and
    3. Help them do that one leap.

    I find this works well. Very well actually!

    The alternative, a complete annihilation of everything that
    "was", a complete annihilation of everything that "is"....in
    favor of the All-New Shiny Thing.... the Shiny Thing that in
    theory "wants to happen"...or so we say...this seems both
    impractical and extremely stressful for the org.

    Not to mention: whatever happened to:

      * /Whenever it starts is the right time?/
      * /Whatever happens is the only thing that could? /

    ....And so I like the idea of "do a little, learn a little,
    integrate...then SHIFT to the next level..."

    The dual-OST, before/after Open Space with 100 days in the
    middle...what we now call Open Agile Adoption....this seems to
    provide the kind of place/space where the folks can actually
    "make some stew" together, and boil it down, and enjoy it, and
    get to a new level of integration. And fast!

    I'm not so sure "annihilation of everything that came before" is
    really such a cool idea. It also seems kind of /forced/ as I
    think about it. Kind of /violent/. I realize stuff has to "die"
    before the new stuff can be "born" but do we have to burn the
    forest down to the ground to get legitimate new growth?

    How many organizations can live through that level of trauma
    without freaking out ?

    Is Open Space JUST for orgs that are in /total crisis/....those
    that are /completely freaked out/....and completely out of aces
    and perceived options?

    Because, I suspect OST is a lot more robust than that.

    I suspect OST  is a lot more versatile than that.

    And this has certainly been my experience so far.

    Daniel















    On 3/21/15 4:18 PM, Harrison wrote:

    Dan --- Our organizations are definitely stodgy. Even the best
    of them seem to clunk along when compared to what they might be
    doing. God knows how you could ever produce any numbers to prove
    this assertion, but I have yet to met anybody (even the wildest
    enthusiast) who would affirm that their organization was running
    in top form. Good yes... but with lots of room for improvement.
    But I suspect that the critical issue is NOT a matter of “low
    level of development,” rather it is a case of self inflicted
    wounds causing radical sub-optimization. The “cure” would then
    be to stop the wounding, at least until we could see how things
    might go. Of course, if the situation really is terminal, then
    by all means, Bring it on! That could be SCRUM, Facilitation,
    Last Rites, whatever...

    So what would an organization look like if it stopped being
    shot? How would it perform?

    Sounds pretty abstract and difficult to visualize... but I do
    believe we get the picture in wild living color, every time we
    have the privilege of opening the space for a damaged
    organization, where the trouble is real and palpable. I’m not
    talking about the two hour Open Space on some frilly, safe
    topic. I mean the real deal where the stakes are seriously high.
    Survival stuff.

    My experience is shared by many, and the stories are often told.
    My most recent encounter was with a very large US federal
    agency, which according to its director was so dysfunctional
    that “most of the people could not find their rear ends with
    both hands” (That’s a direct quote). They were in trouble by any
    standard, and the Chief was so out of options that Open Space
    sounded like a safe way to go – even though he had never seen one.

    Well we did it... and the organization I saw bore no
    relationship to the one that had been described to me. The
    people were all the same, the issues were familiar... but the
    behavior was brilliant. Total flowing conversation with real
    engagement and workable solutions. Mind Bending! And the chief
    was blown away – walking around with a silly grin on his face.

    I invited him to lunch because I wanted to feed him several
    drinks and ask a question. We had the lunch, and after the
    drinks, came the question: “What are you doing, Sir, as a matter
    of everyday business that converts 177 bright, engaged,
    competent people into blundering fools?” He looked a little
    surprised and I said, “I think you might want to stop doing it.”

    Dan – That’s my point. Before we do anything more, different, or
    otherwise – I sincerely believe we need to stop and appreciate
    what apparently happens very naturally, all by itself, with
    minimal or no assistance. And after that appreciative moment, we
    might think of a few things to do, but only a very few.

    Harrison

    Winter Address

    7808 River Falls Drive

    Potomac, MD 20854

    301-365-2093 <tel:301-365-2093>

    Summer Address

    189 Beaucaire Ave.

    Camden, ME 04843

    207-763-3261 <tel:207-763-3261>

    Websites

    www.openspaceworld.com <http://%20www.openspaceworld.com>

    www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com>

    OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the
    archives of OSLIST Go
    to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

    *From:*OSList [mailto:[email protected]]
    *On Behalf Of *Daniel Mezick via OSList
    *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2015 11:32 PM
    *To:* [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [OSList] Agile-in-OpenSpace videos

    Harrison and All,

    Harrison you once said recently:

    "The real operating system is self-organization, Daniel.
    Everything else is an app. Open Space included!"

    I've just recently integrated this idea more fully into my
    thinking. I must admit it has taken "some time."

    That said, my current belief is: most organizations are at a
    very low level of development and can use/typically need the
    "app" of Open Space...and/or the "app" of Scrum... and/or the
    "app" of Sociocracy, what have you.

    I think [facilitation] does fit nicely as a kind of component or
    "widget" in each "app" (facilitation being part of OST, Scrum,
    Kanban) ...all of which run on the real OS of self-organization.

    So these are all self-org "apps." The "f" word does after all
    has the connotation of: "making it easy."


    At Frank Tino's company INTUIT, they have embraced the idea of
    creating "a culture of facilitation." This has resulted in some
    interesting team behaviors...

    ...Frank Tino's staff, for example, does this very impressively
    effective,  brief daily-meeting called the 'daily huddle' at 430
    PM each day and it's super short like 12 minutes... and someone
    plays in the facilitator role each time... and that  f-role
    orbits/rotates around to someone new each day who jumps in to do
    it.

    And it seems to work pretty darned good. Everyone is a
    facilitator at one time or another. I often observe them
    completing each other's sentences in these 430PM meetings...

    I like the idea of having a goal of ELIMINATING the need to for
    any (facilitated!) 'Open Space' gatherings. These gatherings are
    after all simply apps running on the REAL operating system we
    call: "you-know-what."

    Daniel

    On 3/19/15 3:07 PM, Harrison via OSList wrote:

        I guess you could say that replying to your own note is
        rather like talking to yourself. Guilty as charged – but
        then I doit all the time (Talk to myself). Anyhow, I
        expressed the hope that Dan’s videos would not only inspire
        folks toemulate, but also to think about going to the next
        level wherever that might be. I’m not sure I know, but I
        didnotice a little anomaly in the marvelous interviews,
        which might suggest a direction. Dan’s client obviously was
        movedby the Open Space – the quality of conversations, good
        ideas, actions generated, and all the good stuff. Presuming
        that Dan’s Open Space is just like always, those
        generativegroups that the client so enjoyed did it all by
        themselves with not a facilitator in sight. No news here –
        but then inthe final interview, the client waxed enthusedly
        about “facilitation” and said that from here on out he was
        alwaysgoing to have a facilitator. Did I see a little
        disconnect here? A little anomaly? If the folks could “do
        it” in OpenSpace...why not every day, all the time?
        Perchance an opportunity to go to the next level?

        Harrison

        Winter Address

        7808 River Falls Drive

        Potomac, MD 20854

        301-365-2093 <tel:301-365-2093>

        Summer Address

        189 Beaucaire Ave.

        Camden, ME 04843

        207-763-3261 <tel:207-763-3261>

        Websites

        www.openspaceworld.com <http://%20www.openspaceworld.com>

        www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com>

        OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view
        the archives of OSLIST Go
        to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

        *From:*OSList
        [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
        Of *Harrison via OSList
        *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2015 4:57 PM
        *To:* 'Daniel Mezick'; 'World wide Open Space Technology
        email list'
        *Subject:* Re: [OSList] Agile-in-OpenSpace videos

        Dan –this is just wonderful! And to be clear... I never
        could have done what you have done. First off, I don’t
        speakAgile/Scrum/...      I joke, but seriously. And to
        anybody else on this OSLIST, do yourself a favor. Watch
        Dan’s videosthrough. Not with the idea of replicating what
        happened (although that wouldn’t be bad) but to be inspired
        to takeit all to a new level. I so look forward to whatever
        discussion...

        Harrison

        Winter Address

        7808 River Falls Drive

        Potomac, MD 20854

        301-365-2093 <tel:301-365-2093>

        Summer Address

        189 Beaucaire Ave.

        Camden, ME 04843

        207-763-3261 <tel:207-763-3261>

        Websites

        www.openspaceworld.com <http://%20www.openspaceworld.com>

        www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com>

        OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view
        the archives of OSLIST Go
        to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

        *From:*OSList
        [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
        Of *Daniel Mezick via OSList
        *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2015 4:01 PM
        *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* [OSList] Agile-in-OpenSpace videos

        Greetings,

        Find below 15-minute videos of software industry executive
        Frank Tino, explaining his org's journey thru Open Space on
        the way to a genuine, rapid, lasting, enterprise-wide,
        "scaled" Agile adoption.

        Frank's 100-person company (now 150++ just one year layer)
        authorized several full-day before/after Open Space events.
        In between there was 100 days of experimentation and
        learning in between those gatherings. In these videos he
        explains the astonishing results obtained in just 100 days...

        ...Open Space is now part of the cultural fabric of his
        entire organization. And the coaches are GONE.


        <SHAMELESS HYPE WARNING>

        Is Open Agile Adoption something completely new? Well yes,
        it is actually. Thanks for asking! Explained here:

        Open Agile Adoption Theory and Components
        http://openagileadoption.com/open-agile-adoption-components/

        </SHAMELESS HYPE WARNING>


        Here's the links to those executive videos:
        http://openagileadoption.com/open-agile-adoption-videos/


        PART1: 15 mins
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWjNQM7q64o
        PART2: 15 mins
        http://youtu.be/UdSmGS9JTtU
        PART3: 15 mins
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9cpRPlLHYU

        *
        *Open Agile Adoption (OAA) is a new composition of powerful
        elements that work together to strongly encourage positive
        cultural change in organizations. Open Agile Adoption
        incorporates the power of invitation, Open Space, game
        mechanics, passage rites, storytelling and more…so your
        Agile adoption can actually take root.

        OAA is based on people, THEN practices. You can introduce
        any practice or framework with it. Open Agile Adoption is
        based on www.Prime-OS.com <http://www.Prime-OS.com>, which
        is social technology published under an open-source,
        free-to-the-world ("free culture") license from Creative
        Commons.

        www.OpenAgileAdoption.com <http://www.OpenAgileAdoption.com>
        www.Prime-OS.com <http://www.Prime-OS.com>


        Daniel Mezick, President

        New Technology Solutions Inc.

        (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)

        Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
        <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
        <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.

        Examine my new book:The Culture Game
        <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools
        for the Agile Manager.

        Explore Agile Team Training
        <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
        Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

        Explore the Agile Boston
        <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/>Community.




        _______________________________________________

        OSList mailing list

        To post send emails [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>

        To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>

        To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:

        http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

        Past archives can be viewed 
here:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

--
    Daniel Mezick, President

    New Technology Solutions Inc.

    (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)

    Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
    <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
    <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.

    Examine my new book:The Culture Game
    <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for
    the Agile Manager.

    Explore Agile Team Training
    <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
    Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

    Explore the Agile Boston
    <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/>Community.


--
    Daniel Mezick, President

    New Technology Solutions Inc.

    (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)

    Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
    <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
    <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.

    Examine my new book:The Culture Game
    <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for
    the Agile Manager.

    Explore Agile Team Training
    <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
    Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

    Explore the Agile Boston
    <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.


    _______________________________________________
    OSList mailing list
    To post send emails to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To unsubscribe send an email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
    Past archives can be viewed here:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]




_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed 
here:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

--

Daniel Mezick, President

New Technology Solutions Inc.

(203) 915 7248 (cell)

Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.

Examine my new book:The Culture Game <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the Agile Manager.

Explore Agile Team Training <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to