@Bart Eisenberg I can say the same for you. On Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 10:49:16 PM UTC+2, Bart Eisenberg wrote: > > @Lodro This forum has been that rare corner of the web where civility is > the norm. Please follow suit or find another forum. > > On Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 12:15:19 AM UTC-7, Lodro Gyamtso wrote: >> >> this post is special for user "Harry van der Wolf" >> >> who do you think that you are ? who gave you the right to say to other >> people -* Please test yourself before posting these "theories"*. >> Is your ego and arrogance ? That's why i suggest to you "don't say to >> other people what to do into their personal lives" >> >> i am writing a post having experience of my devices or reading posts from >> other users. I did exactly what you made, i write my thoughts as you did, >> without judging other people. I use only what the others say, just to found >> answers. >> >> Using my old smartphone for a route inside the city of 60 Km, the results >> time is over 1 minute for calculation. With my new smartphone for the same >> route needs less of 20secs to draw the route. With all the navigation apps >> i have mentions before, the route results is 1sec (instantaneously) for >> both of my devices. >> >> p.s >> sorry for my english >> >> On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 12:53:14 PM UTC+2, Harry van der Wolf wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Op di 24 mrt. 2020 om 07:32 schreef Lodro Gyamtso <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> after the answer of user "Poutnik", we have another proof that the >>>> OSMAnd and BRoute use slow (bad) technology. >>>> >>>> Software like Here WeGO, Sygic, Tomtom Go, iGO, navigon, navitel, route >>>> 66, copilot, mireo, etc , are far away from this low level apps (OSMAnd >>>> and >>>> BRout). And all of this top companies has offline navigation apps. So, the >>>> user "Episteme PROMENEUR" has right into his first post. >>>> >>>> My opinion is - don't use osmand, locus, orux, brouter, for city >>>> navigation. They are only for mountain use. >>>> >>>> >>> That is not true. Both OsmAnd and BRouter are excellent routers. OsmAnd >>> is slower on longer distances, but that can be tweaked. >>> OsmAnd is even the best in cities due to it's penalty system for traffic >>> lights and traffic bumps and the like. >>> If you calculate a route inside a city, the route might be the same, but >>> OsmAnds ETA is by far the most accurate even though TomTom uses their >>> "smart routing" where they collected statistical data on "heavy use" roads. >>> And sometimes OsmAnds route is different, exactly because it uses these >>> penalties. I personally did many test and especially in cities (!), OsmAnd >>> is by far the best when calculating the route AND the correct ETA. So >>> actually in cities I do use OsmAnd. >>> Please test yourself before posting these "theories". >>> I know less about BRouter, although I used it for cycling, and that was >>> excellent. So why "mountain use"? >>> Here WeGo is currently only a city navigation tool, so useless in my >>> eyes (unless it is builtin into your car navigation set). >>> >>> Finally: There is not one single navigation app in the world that offers >>> the wide portfolio of functionality that OsmAnd does. Not one! >>> >>> Harry >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/07444c14-65bb-484b-b02e-3d56fac4f4e8%40googlegroups.com.
