@Lodro This forum has been that rare corner of the web where civility is the norm. Please follow suit or find another forum.
On Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 12:15:19 AM UTC-7, Lodro Gyamtso wrote: > > this post is special for user "Harry van der Wolf" > > who do you think that you are ? who gave you the right to say to other > people -* Please test yourself before posting these "theories"*. > Is your ego and arrogance ? That's why i suggest to you "don't say to > other people what to do into their personal lives" > > i am writing a post having experience of my devices or reading posts from > other users. I did exactly what you made, i write my thoughts as you did, > without judging other people. I use only what the others say, just to found > answers. > > Using my old smartphone for a route inside the city of 60 Km, the results > time is over 1 minute for calculation. With my new smartphone for the same > route needs less of 20secs to draw the route. With all the navigation apps > i have mentions before, the route results is 1sec (instantaneously) for > both of my devices. > > p.s > sorry for my english > > On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 12:53:14 PM UTC+2, Harry van der Wolf wrote: >> >> >> >> Op di 24 mrt. 2020 om 07:32 schreef Lodro Gyamtso <[email protected]>: >> >>> after the answer of user "Poutnik", we have another proof that the >>> OSMAnd and BRoute use slow (bad) technology. >>> >>> Software like Here WeGO, Sygic, Tomtom Go, iGO, navigon, navitel, route >>> 66, copilot, mireo, etc , are far away from this low level apps (OSMAnd and >>> BRout). And all of this top companies has offline navigation apps. So, the >>> user "Episteme PROMENEUR" has right into his first post. >>> >>> My opinion is - don't use osmand, locus, orux, brouter, for city >>> navigation. They are only for mountain use. >>> >>> >> That is not true. Both OsmAnd and BRouter are excellent routers. OsmAnd >> is slower on longer distances, but that can be tweaked. >> OsmAnd is even the best in cities due to it's penalty system for traffic >> lights and traffic bumps and the like. >> If you calculate a route inside a city, the route might be the same, but >> OsmAnds ETA is by far the most accurate even though TomTom uses their >> "smart routing" where they collected statistical data on "heavy use" roads. >> And sometimes OsmAnds route is different, exactly because it uses these >> penalties. I personally did many test and especially in cities (!), OsmAnd >> is by far the best when calculating the route AND the correct ETA. So >> actually in cities I do use OsmAnd. >> Please test yourself before posting these "theories". >> I know less about BRouter, although I used it for cycling, and that was >> excellent. So why "mountain use"? >> Here WeGo is currently only a city navigation tool, so useless in my eyes >> (unless it is builtin into your car navigation set). >> >> Finally: There is not one single navigation app in the world that offers >> the wide portfolio of functionality that OsmAnd does. Not one! >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/37a3d607-b829-41f1-9083-b10d60069bf4%40googlegroups.com.
