On Dec 29, 2009, at 3:34 AM, Ari Keranen wrote: > > But back to the original question: wouldn't you also, considering all the > points we have discussed, prefer the following format (or something similar) > for the bootstrap-node element: > > <bootstrap-node> > <address>192.0.0.1</address> > <port>5678</port> > <proto>TLS</proto> > </bootstrap-node> > > over the original format: > > <bootstrap-node>192.0.0.1:5678</bootstrap-node> > > With the new format you are free to use the same port for both TLS and DTLS, > but you are not forced to do so. Also, this makes the element much more > extensible. >
I don't prefer this format. I see no value in adding <proto> and moving the port, at least not in my working implementation. You may want to get input from others. > > Cheers, > Ari
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
