Hi, Ari Keranen wrote: > But back to the original question: wouldn't you also, considering all > the points we have discussed, prefer the following format (or > something similar) for the bootstrap-node element: > > <bootstrap-node> > <address>192.0.0.1</address> > <port>5678</port> > <proto>TLS</proto> > </bootstrap-node> > > over the original format: > > <bootstrap-node>192.0.0.1:5678</bootstrap-node> > > With the new format you are free to use the same port for both TLS and > DTLS, but you are not forced to do so. Also, this makes the element > much more extensible.
I like the new format since it is easy to extend. Cheers, Jouni _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
