Would we add text indicating that different ports somehow imply different 
transport/security mechanism (since there were many many folks who supported 
mandatory to implement but not mandatory to use for (D)TLS on list)? I'd 
personally prefer having the flag too, so users can choose both port and 
mechanism to make that easier.

David (as individual)
Sent from my mobile device


-----Original Message-----
From: Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:10:28 
To: Jouni Mäenpää<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] RELOAD overlay configuration document


I was fixing this and it was just not obvious to me if if we really needed the 
TLS flag. Anyone have strong arguments one way or the other?  Regardless of TLS 
decision, it makes sense to split out the address and port. 

Cullen



On Dec 21, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Jouni Mäenpää wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> One question about the "bootstrap-node" element in the RELOAD overlay
> configuration document. In the example configuration document included
> in the RELOAD base draft, the bootstrap-node element has the following
> contents:
> 
> <bootstrap-node>192.0.0.1:5678</bootstrap-node>
> 
> My question is that should the element also specify whether the
> bootstrap node should be contacted using DTLS or TLS? In that case, the
> element could perhaps look as follows:
> 
> <bootstrap-node>
>  <address>192.0.0.1</address>
>  <port>5678</port>
>  <proto>TLS</proto>
> </bootstrap-node>
> 
> Or is the assumption that the bootstrap node uses the same port for both
> TLS and DTLS?
> 
> The above format would also make the bootstrap-node element more extensible.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jouni
>_______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip


Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to