I don't have strong preferences one way or the other. I do't think there was any particular reason why the current format was selected. I do think the DTLS and TLS will be run on the same port.
Cullen <in my individual contributor role> On Dec 30, 2009, at 12:42 AM, Jouni Mäenpää wrote: > Hi, > > Ari Keranen wrote: >> But back to the original question: wouldn't you also, considering all >> the points we have discussed, prefer the following format (or >> something similar) for the bootstrap-node element: >> >> <bootstrap-node> >> <address>192.0.0.1</address> >> <port>5678</port> >> <proto>TLS</proto> >> </bootstrap-node> >> >> over the original format: >> >> <bootstrap-node>192.0.0.1:5678</bootstrap-node> >> >> With the new format you are free to use the same port for both TLS and >> DTLS, but you are not forced to do so. Also, this makes the element >> much more extensible. > > I like the new format since it is easy to extend. > > Cheers, > Jouni > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
