I was fixing this and it was just not obvious to me if if we really needed the TLS flag. Anyone have strong arguments one way or the other? Regardless of TLS decision, it makes sense to split out the address and port.
Cullen On Dec 21, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Jouni Mäenpää wrote: > Hi, > > One question about the "bootstrap-node" element in the RELOAD overlay > configuration document. In the example configuration document included > in the RELOAD base draft, the bootstrap-node element has the following > contents: > > <bootstrap-node>192.0.0.1:5678</bootstrap-node> > > My question is that should the element also specify whether the > bootstrap node should be contacted using DTLS or TLS? In that case, the > element could perhaps look as follows: > > <bootstrap-node> > <address>192.0.0.1</address> > <port>5678</port> > <proto>TLS</proto> > </bootstrap-node> > > Or is the assumption that the bootstrap node uses the same port for both > TLS and DTLS? > > The above format would also make the bootstrap-node element more extensible. > > Cheers, > Jouni > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
