If your splitting out the port I'm for this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> wrote:
I was fixing this and it was just not obvious to me if if we really
needed the TLS flag. Anyone have strong arguments one way or the
other? Regardless of TLS decision, it makes sense to split out the
address and port.
Cullen
On Dec 21, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Jouni Mäenpää wrote:
Hi,
One question about the "bootstrap-node" element in the RELOAD overlay
configuration document. In the example configuration document
included
in the RELOAD base draft, the bootstrap-node element has the
following
contents:
<bootstrap-node>192.0.0.1:5678</bootstrap-node>
My question is that should the element also specify whether the
bootstrap node should be contacted using DTLS or TLS? In that case,
the
element could perhaps look as follows:
<bootstrap-node>
<address>192.0.0.1</address>
<port>5678</port>
<proto>TLS</proto>
</bootstrap-node>
Or is the assumption that the bootstrap node uses the same port for
both
TLS and DTLS?
The above format would also make the bootstrap-node element more
extensible.
Cheers,
Jouni
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
