Yep, I agree, that's kind of my thought as well, so for my part, I'd rather see 
the flag and make it a bit more explict.

David (as individual)
Sent from my mobile device


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:42:22 
To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
Cc: Cullen Jennings, Ph.D.<[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<[email protected]>; Jouni 
Mäenpää<[email protected]>; [email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] RELOAD overlay configuration document



On Mar 7, 2010, at 11:30, "David A. Bryan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Would we add text indicating that different ports somehow imply
> different transport/security mechanism

If you mean use the port to indicate separate security mechanism
without an explicit indicator in the config file, I don't see what
that adds.


Ekr
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to