On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Aaron Ardiri wrote: > it will only be done with ICONS, BITMAPS are a different kettle of > fish :P What I have done to resolve the size issue and maintain compatibility: 1) Compiled two versions, one with color BITMAPFAMILY and one with BITMAP. That saved some prc size. 2) Distributed both versions, leaving color code in both versions. 3) Either version will be compatible with both device types, I hope. The easiest thing would be if black and white users would just live with the extra size. But many don't want the baggage. Here is the phenomena at work: If you make a change that adds a function that someone doesn't need and if that change adds 10K, they won't complain. But if you add color, which also adds 10k, some will complain. Go figure. -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Danny Epstein
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Michael S. Davis
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Richard Hartman
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Mike Davis
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 GreatOwlS
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Michael S. Davis
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 David Fedor
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Bob Ebert
- Re: BITMAPFAMILY - Compatibility Etc with < 3.5 Aaron Ardiri
