> >From an old MetroPUG (www.metropug.org) poll (sorry for the lack of
> formatting):

  ok.. you asked for it :))

Donkie Kung Jr
==============

Logging:    2nd July 2000 -> 16th November 2000 (present)
----
Palm Professional               44   1.34 %
Palm III                       149   4.54 %
Palm IIIe                      169   5.15 %
Palm IIIse                       9   0.27 %
Palm IIIx                      233   7.10 %
Palm IIIxe                     118   3.59 %
Palm IIIc                      604  18.41 %  |
Palm V                         392  11.95 %  | <-- gaming market
Palm Vx                        824  25.12 %  |
Palm M100                       77   2.35 %
Palm VII                        20   0.61 %
Palm VIIx                       10   0.30 %
TRG TRGPro                      89   2.71 %
Handspring Visor                41   1.25 %
Handspring Visor Deluxe        327   9.97 %
Handspring Visor Platinum        -   0.00 %
Handspring Visor Prism           9   0.27 %
IBM Workpad c3                  98   2.98 %
IBM Workpad 30X                 18   0.55 % 
IBM Workpad 20X                  2   0.00 % 
Sony PEG-S300                   19   0.58 %
Sony PEG-S500C                  13   0.39 %
Symbol SPT 1500                  1   0.00 %
Symbol SPT 1700                  1   0.00 %
Symbol SPT 1740                  1   0.00 %
Qualcomm pDQ                     -
Other                           12   0.36 %
----
Total                         3280

  grep.. grep.. wc :) [dont ask me to do this again in a hurry] :P

  with Donkie Kung Jr, the top three devices (IIIc, V and Vx) take up
  55.5% of the total count. now, there are still 44 Palm Professional
  device uses. its probably safe to assume only a few have performed
  the memory upgrade -> 3.0, but this is a TINY percentage :))

  we also need to consider that the SONY and new Visors were just 
  introduced, and since this report goes back to July - those figures
  are not proportional.

> My baseline is OS 3.0.  For my own product, I've had only 1 inquiry to
> support OS 2.0.  There's no way of determining how many people ignored my
> product because I didn't support OS 2.0, but based on this data, I don't
> think it was a significant number.

  my baseline is 2.0 - unless i need to use a 3.0 specific call. there is
  already many instances in my code that says (if 3.5+, do this) - as i
  found a number of inconsistencies between 3.0 -> 3.1 -> 3.3 -> 3.5
  (just minor, but they are there).

  the introduction of the Visor was really a nail in the coffin. if it 
  was not for these types of devices (non flashable) - we would be able
  to set the standard to at least 3.3 (people can get that upgrade for
  free).. but, its a decision that has been made :))

  but then again, even if there was an upgrade available, how many people
  will actually bother with it (3.0 works for most people on III devices)
 
  3.0 is the absolute minimum if you intend to develop. support 2.0 if
  you can, and if you dont have to twist your arm to do so :)) Palm does
  not sell devices running 2.0 - so you can use this as a baseline too.

  cheers

// az "flu, oh flu... go away.."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ardiri.com/    <--- free games!


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/

Reply via email to