cat, so with other words, death to all forums, and go back to the way of mailing lists and uunet
very neoludite. well, what about websites, you don't like those either? because using your logic, one had to go to the website/page, the page does not come to you. but like I said, You win Your logic is unquestionably correct I hope that you feel vindicated now Rick On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:58 PM, cat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rick Steffers wrote: > > > Also, If you care to point out the divisiveness you seem to see, I > > would welcome an opportunity to change it What is exclusive about my > > forum? Like this mailing list I have seasoned people as well as new > > people to the hobby, and we welcome all people. > > The division is you require people to perform a task to get to you. > They must first go online, then go to your site then sign in then search > for any changes in many threads. Each step is a division each separate > thread another. I may not be interested in some aspect of modeling so in > a forum I can easily ignore it and any useful ideas it may contain. In a > list there is is, offered to me and I may, against my will, learn > something I can use. Forums remove serendipity by there very structure. > They force people to post which removes many people who are not > adept > enough in expressing themselves in English but can read it well enough > to be of use to them. Forums also have no coherent structure. Each one > stands alone and must, for the English (or other language) challenged be > labouriously figured out. Many simply give up in frustration, further > fractioning the community. > The very act of demanding members come to you rather than you > "visiting" them divides community. Take a look at how social > communication on the net has deteriorated since the virtual dissolution > of the UUNET by ISPs. For a while mail lists and groups were holding > things together until the community they built was attacked by "forums" > and "social networking" that thrived on breaking the community into bite > sized morsels so that the delivery of advertising and group control was > more easily exercised. Many Forum operators swallowed the "this is good" > idea never understanding they were just being played by advertisers. > After all someone has to pay for the site, don't they? > Forums further divided people by language and age and more and more > specific interest until the community had been so shattered it started > to devolve. > > > How does my forum or any forum do irreparable damage or harm? I would > > like to see examples if you can provide it. > > This has been covered to death in social science publications and > things like the Journal of Communications and all agree that the > "online" move has fractionalized and weakened the proto community the > Internet started. About the only voices saying otherwise are the forum > operators, and the advertisers. > > > Many of the members of my forum are members of various other forums > > and mailing lists. > > True and that is evidence of fractionilism right there. A community > is > unified and does not have to run all over to get their info. The more > forums there are the less community there is. > > cat > > > > -- "Rock is Dead, Long Live Paper and Scissors" Want the same traffic, attitude, and information? Check out www.papermodelers.com Love Racing? Love Paper Models? Check Out http://rpmodels.proboards46.com/ http://paperdakar.blogspot.com/ http://picasaweb.google.com/rickstef http://internationalpapermodelconvention.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Papermodels II" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Papermodels?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
