In a message dated 2/26/01 4:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << So why don't you? >> He reported using SUPRA in his tests. My question was intended for the reporter to answer, not you to ask me rhetorically, William. Besides, SUPRA (all of them) stand for themselves, with no subjective views (mine included) needed. Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Test-Driving the MZ-S tom
- Re: Test-Driving the MZ-S Chris Brogden
- Re: Test-Driving the MZ-S Ed Mathews
- Re: Test-Driving the MZ-S dick graham
- MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h Ed Mathews
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h Chris Brogden
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h David A. Mann
- Re: Test-Driving the MZ-S Paul
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? aimcompute
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? William Robb
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? Tiger Moses
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? aimcompute

