[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fuji makes great film. But formulating film for scanning is not their forte. > KODAK makes the PORTRA and SUPRA films. ~All~ of them are formulated to be > scanned, the SUPRA breed outperforming its sibling and nearly everything else. What issues did you have when comparing which Kodak and Fuji films while scanning? You trot out this line a lot, so I'm curious as to what you're backing it up with aside from Kodak's sales pitch. Fuji advertise the newest formulations of NPS and NPC as optimized for scanning, too, y'know. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h Ed Mathews
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h Chris Brogden
- Re: MZ-S Test Drive results (long)h David A. Mann
- Re: Test-Driving the MZ-S Paul
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? aimcompute
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? William Robb
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? Tiger Moses
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? SudaMafud
- Re: Scanning Fuji Superia 400? aimcompute
- Films can be optimized for scanning (was Re: Scann... Gerald Cermak
- Re: Films can be optimized for scanning (was R... aimcompute
- Re: Films can be optimized for scanning (w... Anthony Farr
- Re: Films can be optimized for scanni... aimcompute

