I don't know about MMC...if you got a card with your camera, it was likely similar to a slow 4x, which would probably be the limiting factor for downloads.
-- Thomas Van Veen Photography www.bigdayphoto.com 301-758-3085 > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Does digital "film" memory wear out? > > > Must just be a slow card I had then? Or is MMC slower than > CF anyway? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11 August 2003 16:00 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Does digital "film" memory wear out? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > I only have limited experience, but have found that the > difference > > > between USB 1.1 and USB 2 card readers is negligible. The > > read speed > > > of the card/reader seems to be the limiting factor here. > > > > I have found a huge difference between USB 2 and 1 readers > > with 16x and 30x cards. I'd guess the USB 2 reader cut my > > download times about 60 or 70%. > > > > tv > > > > > > > > >
