That's both the blessing and the curse of a Mac. It comes with a pretty good choice of hardware; as good as most configurations you could put together yourself, after carefully doing your homework.
The downside is that you sometimes end up paying for some extras that you could do without. But nowadays the prices are much closer, so that extra premium is less significant; you need to value your time pretty cheaply to justify the amount of effort needed to save a noticeable sum. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mused: > > We're back to PC plug-in here. I've seen a dual 2.5 G5 run the 30-inch > monitor with the factory equipped video card. It's excellent. > Paul > > > > On 1 Feb 2005 at 18:16, John Francis wrote: > > > > > For $80 you can get a graphics card that supports multiple monitors at > > > insane resolutions, has 128MB of on-board graphcs memory, and even TV. > > > > These types of specs still don't assure the card output will be excellent > > for > > imaging. At high resolutions and refresh speeds DAC speed/linearity, > > analogue > > tuning and board lay-outs do affect absolute resolution and perceived > > quality > > screen (DVI interfaces excluded) > > > > > > Rob Studdert > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > >
