You means it's happening to YOU TOO? "-)


Tom C.








>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:09:46 -0400
>
>Shel,
>
>Considering this is about the only concern I've had with the K10D
>launch, I'm really wondering where the hell you're coming from. I've
>been relentlessly positive about the entire thing, and my response to
>Godfrey was pointing out a potential problem that he had dismissed as
>'never going to happen', not even saying that the problem would happen,
>just that it had before in a similar situation.
>
>Stop reading stuff in my posts that I'm not saying. I've damned well not
>been angsting about the camera. In fact I've posted at least once that
>Pentax has essentially got every feature I want to have in the K10D.
>
>-Adam
>
>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > Well, it seems that you're a "glass is half empty" kind of guy, and I'm 
>a
> > "glass is half full" sort.  You can go ahead and metaphorically wring 
>your
> > hands and be concerned that something that happened to Nikon _may_ 
>happen
> > to Pentax, I'll just wait for the camera to arrive and buy one as soon 
>as
> > it seems practical to do so. I'll then use it and enjoy it, adjust to
> > whatever features - or lack of features - the camera offers.  I'll leave
> > the angst to those who feel a need for it.
> >
> > Shel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>[Original Message]
> >>From: Adam Maas
> >
> >
> >>The D200/18-200VR situation is an issue. The K10D isn't, but it could
> >>become one if Pentax made the same mistakes as Nikon. But the K10D is
> >>making very similar waves outside of the Pentaxian world to what the
> >>D200 (the first weather-sealed semi-pro DSLR in the sub-$2K market,
> >>replacing an old and slow semi-pro body  that had been ecipsed by
> >>Nikon's consumer bodies) made last fall. Lots of people jumped on it. So
> >>I'm concerned that the same supply issues might happen to Pentax. If so,
> >>that would be an issue.
> >>
> >>What I'm hoping for is that Pentax can at least mostly meet demand, and
> >>that demand is very strong.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to