You might be okay with a  deeper hood, but not with a smaller hood.  
And I wouldn't be surprised if you saw some vignetting at 50mm with  
the deeper hood. Tulip hods are the best compromise configuration for  
a rectangular format zoom. Pentax seems to have a good grasp of the  
design parameters that make for a good tulip hood. I doubt that a  
substitute would be better.
Paul
On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:

> I'd have to get used to all the things to think about with variable
> aperture.  Seems that in order to get some semblance of stability,  
> you've
> got to shoot at smaller aps ...
>
> Why not a smaller hood?  The hood I used was designed for a 200mm  
> hood?  It
> protects better than the original based on preliminary tests.  The  
> hood
> that comes with the lens is designed to fit over the lens, and does  
> not
> offer the best protection.  Had some probs with a similar hood on the
> 16-45.  I'm going to try for an even tighter, perhaps deeper, hood  
> for the
> 50-200.
>
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Paul Stenquist
>
>> The variable aperture isn't too much of a problem if you shoot with
>> aperture priority and set it at 5.6 or smaller. Or shoot with shutter
>> priority and set it at a speed where you can be sure you won't run
>> out of aperture. It's not ideal. I'm looking forward to the new DA*
>> 60-200, but it works. And more importantly, the optics are quite
>> good. The hood seems to do its job. It's size doesn't bother me. I
>> certainly wouldn't want a smaller hood for a lens with 200 mm reach.
>> Paul
>> On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>> OPh, I just thought of something else I didn't like - actually, two
>>> things.
>>> That crappy plastic hood is too big.  I brought along a nice,  
>>> smaller
>>> screw-in hood that's considerably "tighter" and which did a great
>>> job on
>>> the 50-200.  The variable aperture is annoying, and I guess I'd
>>> have to
>>> learn how to use a lens with that configuration.  I don't know
>>> enough about
>>> how the exposure, aperture, and shutter speed are adjusted as the  
>>> lens
>>> moves through the focal range.
>>>
>>> Shel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> [Original Message]
>>>> From: Shel Belinkoff
>>>
>>>> I wish I had a lot of great news to report, but I was only able to
>>>> use the
>>>> lens for a short while.  The owner of the lens had to head home
>>>> before I
>>>> could really give it a workout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to