Ecke wrote: .IMHO the solution should be a low tech item that can be sold .separately. One or more identically coded RFID dog tags / garment tags .for the kid and a keychain device for the parents that will go off .whenever none of the RFID items is in reach. Market it as a loss-stop .device for everything and anything. If someone sues you over the death .of a baby, tell them it was designed to protect your belongings and .not your own flesh and blood. Take a side route.
Good point, might be an alternative to factory-issued protective devices. I still think the absent minded may forget to keep d...@mn&d batteries fresh, tho. Manage to build such with some kind of movement- charging device and it'll be almost foolproof... A factory-issued item would be part of the periodic maintenance schedule, and probably best to the function. But more sue-able too. Luiz Felipe luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br http://www.techmit.com.br/luizfelipe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
