.Larry's own words... .I certainly don't doubt that for the parent of the child, no price would be to high to save the kid. But my complaint is with trying to equip every car with that solution. .Should every person in the US pay a dollar to maybe save half a dozen babies, when that same money could probably save hundreds if spent elsewhere? . .My inclination would be a bluetooth device that you could clip to the baby seat, and a program that would run on your cell phone, or a dedicated device) that would .alert when the sensor got out of range. Likewise, it could alert if the temperature got too high, or too low.
Larry, I kind of agree on the math - not placing a value on life but wishing to make more of the resources. But I suspect bringing the number of those tragedies to zero over some time span would mean some financial savings as well. I'd try it just for the life loss, but there is some money spent on those cases that would be saved otherwise. I do suspect those factory-installed devices would increase car prices by more than 10 dollars... Maybe between you and Ecke some chinese venture may be developed to market those aftermarket devices. I'd probably buy one myself, to interface it into the nano-itx videorecorder and mp3 player I'm trying to build. Ecke, if you go for the movement generator there is a whole green effect - very interesting these days. :-) Luiz Felipe luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br http://www.techmit.com.br/luizfelipe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
