On 2011-04-19 18:20 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Re: Lr& Aperture: I find them both equally versatile with both raw and JPEG, but of course there's simply less editability with JPEG files. Both excel at image management, something that pixel editors like PS and PSE are not designed to do at all.
from my reading, i gather that LR has a wider range of built-in filters and especially impresses people more with its noise filters; those are what i feel i might be missing using Aperture, but they frankly aren't crucial to me -- i pretty much work hard on exposure and rendering, and sometimes crop and tilt; plus i tag and group and search; Aperture has those well covered
speed is also an issue in my workflow, but i doubt LR would be hugely faster; if it were, it might be worth switching for me
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
