My process also.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: For Whom is Aperture etc. really
I've tried Lightroom, but I still prefer PhotoShop. I use Bridge as an
organizer, and it works fine with my system. In terms of rendering, I
prefer the two-step ACR/PhotoShop process to Lightroom, and I find it just
as quick. Plus, almost all car photography requires some Photoshop work,
in terms of unwanted highlights, reflections, pavement cleanup, etc. I
suppose I could get used to using Lightroom, rather than ACR as a front
end, but I see no need and my few attempts at doing so have always led me
right back to Photoshop. But I'm old and stubborn.
Paul
On Apr 20, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
These days, I totally don't recommend Photoshop for photographers.
Yes, there are certain kinds of defects that can only be fixed, and
wholesale bit surgery that can only be performed, in Photoshop. But
for 80% of photogs iPhoto or equivalent will do what they need, and
for 90% of the remaining 20%, including most PDML types, I suspect
Aperture or Lightroom will float their boat just fine.
I use Lightroom, but watching the general flow of discussion, suspect
that Lr/Aperture is more or less a wash these days; or it was until
Aperture suddenly got cheaper with the arrival of the App Store. -T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
