I've tried Lightroom, but I still prefer PhotoShop. I use Bridge as an organizer, and it works fine with my system. In terms of rendering, I prefer the two-step ACR/PhotoShop process to Lightroom, and I find it just as quick. Plus, almost all car photography requires some Photoshop work, in terms of unwanted highlights, reflections, pavement cleanup, etc. I suppose I could get used to using Lightroom, rather than ACR as a front end, but I see no need and my few attempts at doing so have always led me right back to Photoshop. But I'm old and stubborn. Paul
On Apr 20, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Tim Bray wrote: > These days, I totally don't recommend Photoshop for photographers. > Yes, there are certain kinds of defects that can only be fixed, and > wholesale bit surgery that can only be performed, in Photoshop. But > for 80% of photogs iPhoto or equivalent will do what they need, and > for 90% of the remaining 20%, including most PDML types, I suspect > Aperture or Lightroom will float their boat just fine. > > I use Lightroom, but watching the general flow of discussion, suspect > that Lr/Aperture is more or less a wash these days; or it was until > Aperture suddenly got cheaper with the arrival of the App Store. -T > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
