I agree.  There is not much difference in Pentax 50mm lens performance
from the K50/1.4 thru M50/1.4,  A50/1.4, and FA50/1.4.  Same for the
K50/1.7 thru M50/1.7, A50/1.7, and F50/1.7.  I expect the same applies
to the F50/1.4 and FA50/1.7, but I've never used those particular
lenses (or even held copies of them).  Regards,  Bob S.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Optics on all Pentax 50mm lenses are pretty much constant in each lens line.
>  The 1.7 hasn't really changed since 1977 when the original M version was
> released.  The f1.4 goes back even further, sometime in the 1960's when it
> was first released in M42 mount as a Super Takumar.  There have been minor
> improvements but really the M version is mostly as good optically as the FA
> version and every one in between.  The A is the most common with full
> aperture automation.  I just like the F version myself, because it looks a
> bit odd.
>
>
>
> On 2/7/2012 6:11 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> I've stumbled across the A* 50 in past searches and noticed that it being
>> less expensive than I would have expected. I always figured it must be due
>> to poor optics. I guess it must be that there are so many of them around?
>>
>> -- Walt
>>
>> On 2/7/2012 5:02 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>
>>> Both of those are autofocus.  The A* 50mm is a real bargain if you're a
>>> dyi focuser.
>>>
>>> On 2/7/2012 5:59 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm inclined to agree with you there, P.J.
>>>>
>>>> I love my manual primes, but I'm still not good enough with them to
>>>> focus quickly and get consistent results. I would like to have an 
>>>> auto-focus
>>>> prime in my kit for shooting candid portraits and events.
>>>>
>>>> -- Walt
>>>>
>>>> On 2/7/2012 4:52 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm thinking it'll be more cost effective to look for a nice 50mm f1.7
>>>>> in F or FA livery.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/7/2012 5:41 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm. The 50/1.8 sounds like something to start saving pennies for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just wonder how many pennies it's going to take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Walt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/7/2012 4:27 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DPreview broke the news:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/07/Pentax_In-development_lenses
>>
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Model name (tentative): smc PENTAX-DA 560mm F5.6
>>>>>>> - Unifocal super-telephoto lens for use with K mount
>>>>>>> interchangeable-lens digital cameras
>>>>>>> - Sharp, well-defined images — particularly with distant subjects —
>>>>>>> thanks to the adoption of optics used in astronomical telescopes
>>>>>>> - Market launch scheduled for 2012
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Model name (tentative): smc PENTAX-DA 50mm F1.8
>>>>>>> - Unifocal standard lens for use with K mount interchangeable-lens
>>>>>>> digital cameras
>>>>>>> - Maximum aperture of F1.8 for high-quality images with a superb
>>>>>>> rendition of depth and natural bokeh (out-of-focus) effect
>>>>>>> - Market launch scheduled for 2012
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid
> a lengthily search.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to