> From: George Sinos <[email protected]> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's >> a rare product that can sell and compete by boasting about what it >> DOESN'T have/do. > > Apple has made quite a business of it. Of course, as you say, there > aren't too many Apple like companies out there. > > gs
They're certainly profitable. They've made a religion out of it actually, or their customers have. I'd venture to say a significant portion of customers can't define why they bought Apple just like a significant portion of Nikon or Canon users can't define why they bought those products as opposed to another. As someone stated, a large portion of the camera buying public doesn't realize there's different sensor sizes. Apple doesn't really boast about what they don't have. They claim to be superior to other products and be better at doing whatever function A or B. That judgement call is at least as subjective as what kind of camera system one purchases. Anyway, not trying to debate on it. Better things to do on a Sunday. :) Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
