> On Apr 7, 2015, at 21:39 , Igor PDML-StR <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> 
>>> On Apr 7, 2015, at 12:46 , John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ran across this one while wandering around the web.
>>> 
>>> http://lensbaby.com/usa/velvet56.php
>>> 
>>> 56mm f/1.6 manual focus. Seems to be reasonably priced.
>>> 
>>> Generally I wouldn't mention such except that it is one of the few I've
>>> seen that IS available in Pentax K-mount.
>>> 
>>> Start's shipping 13 April.
>>> 
>> 
>> I've never understood the appeal of the "Lensbaby" line..
>> 
>> Isn't it just a way to get "Instamatic" quality shots from your
>> multi-thousand dollar digital setup?  What is the appeal?
> 
> Charles,
> 
> I see the point that Bruce is trying to make: experimenting with an 
> "non-orthodox" lens can occasionally give some interesting results.
> While I am trying to do that myself with a fish-eye, I was also puzzled by 
> Lensbaby line when it was introduced.
> 
> At one of the photo-equipment shows in San Diego back in 2007, I came to the 
> stand with Lensbaby, and directly asked the lady presenting the first line of 
> Lensbaby lenses: "So, what's the appeal? What can I do with these lenses?" I 
> was genuinely interested. But she must have took that as an attack, and after 
> saying one sentence turned away to somebody else (rather rudely), and never 
> came back. I just shook by shoulders and went to something else that 
> interested me.
> 

I realize my question, too, may have sounded confrontative - not my intent!  I 
did see some good responses, people - thanks. 

It's not my cuppa, but then again "that's why they make chocolate AND vanilla"!

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to