The cardin o't, the spinnin o't, The warpin o't, the winnin o't❢ ☞
FS:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13888
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13890
CG:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13998
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14105
SJ:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14107
Sung & All,
If we abduce the existence of a reality immanent in appearances then we take
that reality as our object and we cast its appearances in the role of signs.
The signs of reality that come unbidden to us in the data of our senses,
extended by the sense data that we labor to gather with elaborate instruments,
all of that we pore over in the collective record of our observations and try to
make some initial sense of in our various and sundry phenomenologies.
The models that we build in the image of reality and the imitation of phenomena
may be viewed as signs of reality, too, and those we collect in our mathematics.
So it is certainly possible to see a triadic sign relation rising into salience
here, organizing the relationship that exists among the object domain of reality
the two kinds of sign domains, phenomenal and mathematical.
Getting any further than these amusing speculations with that idea, however,
will demand that we take up consequential, effective, "pragmatically practical"
definitions of triadic relations and sign relations. That will take some work.
Regards,
Jon
Sungchul Ji wrote:
> Jon,
>
> "Mind being grounded in triadic relations", which I would agree with, is a
> hypothesis about or a model of reality which may or may not turn out to be
> grounded in triadic relations. No ?
>
> This question is prompted by what I recently called the
> "Reality-Phenomenon-Model" (RPM) category theory of everything.
>
> With all the best.
>
> Sung
> ________________________________________________
> Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
> Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
> Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
> Rutgers University
> Piscataway, N.J. 08855
> 732-445-4701
>
> www.conformon.net
>
>
>> | If mind is grounded in triadic relations
>> | and reality is grounded in triadic relations
>> | then what remains is to study the ways that
>> | more mindful materials and less mindful materials
>> | differ within the variety of triadic relations.
>>
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.inquiry/3979
http://web.archive.org/web/20120917155642/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8570
>>
>> jon
>>
>> Frederik Stjernfelt wrote:
>>> Dear Edwina, Stan, lists -
>>>
>>> But there is triadicity all over the place -
>>> all regularity, vague or strong, in the universe
>>> falls under Peirce's category of Thirdness.
>>> But not all thirdnesses are signs - even if they
>>> form a condition of possibility for signs to emerge …
>>>
>>> Best F
>>
>
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
