Dear Sung, lists, I do not think so - not in any non-trivial sense, that is. To me, to say non-biological physics is semiotic is a bit equivalent to saying that dead matter is living beings with a zero metabolism, or to say that atoms are molecules with a zero degree of connection, or one person is a zero-degree social structure - such claims are not false, but they do not add much to our understanding of things.
Best F Den 10/09/2014 kl. 22.31 skrev Sungchul Ji <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: "Does entropy or entropy change implicate semiosis ?" (091014-4)
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
