Since my blog post for today concerns the relationship between existence and 
determination, I’m copying it here under this subject line. The blog version is 
at http://gnusystems.ca/wp/2016/05/niche-fulfillment/ .

 

Gary f.

 

} Innocence sees that this is it, and finds it world enough, and time. [Annie 
Dillard] {

 <http://gnusystems.ca/wp/> http://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ Turning Signs gateway

 

 

 

A niche in meaning space <http://www.gnusystems.ca/TS/mns.htm#nchmns>  insists 
on being filled if possible, and determines the form of its occupant, but not 
the actual existence of that occupant. It can only select something more or 
less vaguely resembling that form and actually existing in the universe where 
the system can find it; the act of meaning, the triadic action 
<http://www.gnusystems.ca/TS/tpx.htm#trax>  of a sign, involves its existence, 
its secondness.

 

There are different kinds of existence. There is the existence of physical 
actions, there is the existence of psychical volitions, there is the existence 
of all time, there is the existence of the present, there is the existence of 
material things, there is the existence of the creations of one of 
Shakespeare’s plays, and, for aught we know, there may be another creation with 
a space and time of its own in which things may exist. Each kind of existence 
consists in having a place among the total collection of such a universe. It 
consists in being a second to any object in such universe taken as first. It is 
not time and space which produce this character. It is rather this character 
which for its realization calls for something like time and space. 

— Peirce, CP 1.433 (c. 1896)

 

In this sense, Secondness as individual existence ‘calls for’ continuity as 
Thirdness, while on the other side of the coin of meaning, the niche in meaning 
space ‘calls for’ its inhabitation. Semiosic determination, like the 
‘imprinting’ of a new hatchling on its parent, is a reciprocal realization.

 

We know that the newborn chick looking for its mom actually relies on at least 
two different neural systems, one for orienting toward stimuli that are good 
candidates for being mom, and another for taking whatever it can get, for 
storing a memory of anything that the chick might be exposed to. The first 
system will choose an adult chick (or even a stuffed duck) over a box as its 
go-to-caregiver, but if there’s nothing else around, the second system will 
lead the chick to settle for the box. 

— Marcus (2004, 104) 

 

The first system here would correspond to the top half of the meaning cycle 
<http://www.gnusystems.ca/TS/mdl.htm#meancyc> , the second system to the bottom 
half. Likewise, a reader looking for guidance in a turning sign or “scripture” 
will ‘seek until he finds’ and then use whatever he finds to guide his practice 
(including any further seeking); the niche in meaning space that yearns for 
fulfillment will be filled regardless of which text the seeker ‘finds.’

 

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to