Jon A.: Thanks for your comments. Stephen: Ditto. Could you please elaborate on what you mean by "an ethical index" in this context?
Regards, Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Stephen C. Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > A sequential triadic means of actual practical life requires a step past > Peirce although all the elements of this sequential means are implicit in > his writings. I believe it is the need for an ethical index that must be > argued, along with the obvious point that only conscious action that is > considered can be said to count as a documentable indication of practical > results. > > amazon.com/author/stephenrose > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jon, >> >> Thanks for the link. >> >> The duality or complementarity between Thought and Action (Dewey) >> or Information and Control (as later generations came to cast it >> within cybernetics, computer science, and the systems sciences) >> has always been an integral feature of Peirce's Pragmatic Maxim. >> Many of my early days on the Peirce List were exhausted in the >> effort to communicate the implications of that integration. >> But the pull toward Spectator Philosophies (James) is very >> persistent and it will no doubt take the exertion of many >> wills to overcome their one-sighted bias. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jon >> >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
