BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Jon - just a few of my concerns about your definitions - but - I'm
not going to get into another endless debate. I'm sure you'll respond
- but - we'll have to leave it with that.
You have informed us, in this thread that:
.Perfect Sign = a Quasi-mind
- the Quasi-Mind is a bundle of habits capable of habit change by
experience [Note: this rules out Firstness in this situation]
- Mind=Quasi-mind
- Agent= Quasi-mind
- Utterer and Interpreter are individual Quasi-minds that become
welded in the sign
- the Sign = a medium of communication of a Form between them
- Form = 1stness.
I don't know if you can see the contradictions and problems in these
definitions.
Edwina
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
