Udo Güngerich schrieb:
> Thomas Wittek wrote:
>> Unfortunately you probably have to throw away/heavily modify earlier
>> increments, if you add features like a flexible syntax, which will need
>> a different internal infrastructure.
> Well, if object-oriented design has any advantage at all, here it is!
> Only you will have to define the abstract class or plugin bay from the first
> minute in the right way (the "only" was softly ironic).
Of course. But I guess that the architecture/design for such a flexible
piece of software will be relatively complex. I think that creating this
architecture might even take too long to get a running wiki quickly.
Where "quickly" of course is a term still to be defined ;)