-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Except that its clear that they already HAVE gotten "legal" orders for such > surveillance. E.g. AT&T secret room, GCHQ's deal with Level 3, etc...
If it was purely legal they would do it above the table, installing a tap inside the data center themselves. They don’t, and most companies would find that a wide overreach. Encrypting the links that transport lots of private data to faraway places look like a reasonable practice. But it is one of many possible solutions. It may well be more practical to use a form of end-to-end encryption between the components of the data centers. See classic debate on end-to-end versus link-by-link, in which end-to-end tends to win most of the time. - -- Christian Huitema -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32) Comment: Using gpg4o v3.1.107.3564 - http://www.gpg4o.de/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSeaESAAoJELba05IUOHVQ754H/0Vkcm9bt45ynKUIMuyPsdTW azAj3LI4gKbPzAdcPiEzbrgDzQAM9BAoLbt3pQybCxMUb99VRzLGZPI8XJDXjLT5 OnEglGSrJcyqAn6fjCE+CHIrppWiTXrrhA+zP85Gc7r4bnVtCXAFcOUf9mfbbAbb cS1sSJA9mFGn7ZjiYd9Mn/a0Jm/JulxZ8FYmmtSzw7hTQbMUq8vm6Z2JOAaIxbZc xSWGcSc2xwYkFaQKvTY5Vj7iNiw66wmmsHg3jMMTGW8RW8LX5BTQMTaqi8gqPdVv YkvyHQErrlKIzWFwfovVWtVvKxzp3fGspfB6pInqf4QfaqM3ESGdoxggFcJw4Zs= =0UDg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
