On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> "Srf" is ugly as can be, and unintelligible. SetResult might be OK. > >> The operation we're performing here, IIUC, is projection. SetResult >> lacks a verb, although Set could be confused with one; someone might >> think this is the node that sets a result, whatever that means. >> Anyway, I suggest working Project in there somehow. If Project by >> itself seems like it's too generic, perhaps ProjectSet or >> ProjectSetResult would be suitable. > > Andres' patch is already using "SetProjectionPath" for the path struct > type. Maybe make that "ProjectSetPath", giving rise to a "ProjectSet" > plan node?
+1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
