Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> Until you have used this, it seems strange. After you start it doesn't 
> >>>> ;-)
> >>> Sure, but with openness comes cruft, which can be a problem too.  Do we
> >>> want everyone's idea of a useful feature listed?  I don't.
> >> Why not as long as we have someone who can actually make "approved" 
> >> todos versus wishlist type stuff.
> > 
> > So you want a wish-list wiki?  Great idea, I can link to it from the
> > TODO list.  Is that all people want?
> 
> Do you miss my point (not being sarcastic) about having:
> 
> 1. Better descriptions about the todo/feature? E.g; feature specification

I am not sure there is enough churn of TODO items to make larger
descriptions worth it.  As it is, I have to link to new URLs as the TODO
item is clarified.

> 2. The ability to categorize todo items

Categorize how?

> 3. Heck *your portion* of the TODO would be easily satisfied by having a 
> single line with a link that points to the specific wiki page.

But who is going to do that if no one has done anything in the past for
the TODO list.  I keep asking that.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to