Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> 1. Better descriptions about the todo/feature? E.g; feature specification > > > > I am not sure there is enough churn of TODO items to make larger > > descriptions worth it. As it is, I have to link to new URLs as the TODO > > item is clarified. > > Are you kidding? Did you see the discussion just on the todo item that I > tried to do?
Right, but the problem was a poor TODO item that needed improvement. I don't think I even remembered the reason for the item, but over time the requirement for the item had changed, I think, or it wasn't clear at the time it was proposed. > > > >> 2. The ability to categorize todo items > > > > Categorize how? > > > >> 3. Heck *your portion* of the TODO would be easily satisfied by having a > >> single line with a link that points to the specific wiki page. > > > > But who is going to do that if no one has done anything in the past for > > the TODO list. I keep asking that. > > I believe that Andrew and I as well as a few others would be willing to > do it. Of course I am speaking for Andrew here and I hope he agrees. I > also know that Devrim would be more then happy to help out. OK, so what do you want to do? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match