> What I'm more concerned about, with Jan's proposal, is the assumption 
> that you always want to resolve conflicts by time (except for 
> balances, 
> for which we don't have much information, yet). I'd rather 

Um, I think the proposal was only for beneficial backend functionality
for replication in general and time based conflict resolution. And "time
is surely one of the important conflict resolution methods for async MM

Sure there are others, like "rule based" "priority based" but I think
you don't need additional backend functionality for those.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to