Josh Berkus wrote: > Magnus, > >> I'd also vote for changing the name of the "non encrypted" version to >> just "gss" instead of "gss-np". > > I don't. We'll want to support GSS encryption once we have the code, so we > should leave the namespace open to address that. > >> Oh, and I do think putting in GSSAPI authentication only (and not >> encryption) is the way to go for now, since we can do encryption with >> OpenSSL. It'll make the changes localized to just the authentication. > > For now, yes. In the long run, we want to provide users with other methods > of encrypted connections than the rather flaky and > not-available-on-every-platform OpenSSL.
I'm curious - on what platform is OpenSSL NOT available ? Stefan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly