Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > >> I suggest "redirect_logs", although it's arguably too general as it > > >> doesn't apply to syslog/eventlog. > > > > > > Perhaps it should be named analogously to stats_start_collector, > > > ie think of the syslogger process as a "log collector". I don't > > > much like "log_start_collector" though --- "start_log_collector" > > > seems far less confusing as to where the verb is. > > > > Nobody else seems to care much. I'll go with "start_log_collector". > > Are we trying to use log_* prefixes, e.g. log_start_collector?
That sounds like you want to log when the collector starts, which is not the case and is confusing -- what collector is it talking about? This is about starting the log collector. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/ "How amazing is that? I call it a night and come back to find that a bug has been identified and patched while I sleep." (Robert Davidson) http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2006-03/msg00378.php ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
