On 8/27/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Is not quite complete
Only because it wasn't merged into the core. Which, like I said, would be difficult to get consensus on design, grammar, and implementation when it's a brand new and non-standard feature only a few people understand. I honestly don't think a project like that would've ever gotten off the ground in -hackers. Being a contrib module makes it a bit more flexible and gives people the chance to try it out; that way we'll see if it's worth merging into the core. Think of it as a Phase I of Full DIsjunctions... Phase II is a bit of a redesign and merge into 8.3.
2. Does not follow postgresql style guidelines
This statement was not made.
I believe those two points were made by Tom but I can't find his response so if I am on crack -- I apologize in advance.
One of the points, taken a little out of context, was made by Tom. -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
